linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: signal: Skip tests if required features are missing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210920123116.GF4192@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:31:16 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: signal: Skip tests if required features
 are missing

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:30:14PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:22:40PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > > During initialization of a signal testcase, features declared as required
> > > are properly checked against the running system but no action is then taken
> > > to effectively skip such a testcase.

> > Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

> > I have a version of this locally which I thought I'd sent out already
> > among all the in flight patches I've got for kseltest but it looks like
> > it didn't make it.

> Ah ok sorry, I did not know. Pick either as you wish.

No, please use this one - like I say I thought I'd sent mine out but it
looks like I didn't.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)