[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1fcmCWsOuqF8qy4ko9MC8nCd4gyt2K6Rk5K-Zs7yCbJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 14:50:52 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Hyun Kwon <hyun.kwon@...inx.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@....com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jianqiang Chen <jianqiang.chen@...inx.com>,
Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>,
Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:47 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> It's only a few bytes of data in struct dma_device, but a bit more in
> .text here. Is the simplification really required in this driver ?
The intention was to not change the resulting object code in this driver,
and I still don't see where it would grow after dead-code-elimination removes
all the unused static functions. What am I missing?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists