[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vrcxh2lf3rbcjc.fsf@plvision.eu>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:29:43 +0300
From: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] nvmem: core: introduce cells parser
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org> writes:
> On 20/09/2021 13:29, Vadym Kochan wrote:
>>
>> Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 20/09/2021 12:25, Vadym Kochan wrote:
>>>>>> Or, treat cells with length "0" in a special way and allow to update
>>>>>> cell info later.you can update irrespective of the length, as long as this is done
>>>>> before register.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> some_dev_node {
>>>>>>> compatible = "xxx";
>>>>>>> nvmem-cells = <&mac_address>;
>>>>>>> nvmem-cell-names = "mac-address";
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> == CODE ==
>>>>>>> ret = of_get_mac_address(dev->of_node, base_mac);
>>>>>>> ==========
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you notice the mac_address node reg is 0.
>>>>>>> This node "reg" property should be updated ( using of_update_property())
>>>>>>> by nvmem-provider driver while tlv parsing and by matching the node name
>>>>>>> with tlv name.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume parser driver can just invoke add_cell_table (with may be
>>>>>> by adding 'bool update' field to the cell_info struct) and core.c will just
>>>>>> update existing cells parsed from OF.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Lets keep the core code clean for now, I would expect the provider
>>>>> driver along with parser function to do update the nodes.
>>>>>
>>>>> --srini
>>>>>
>>>> core.c sequence:
>>>>
>>>> 1) after cells parsed from OF:
>>>>
>>>> 2) lookup the parser
>>>>
>>>> 3) parser->cells_parse(ctx, table)
>>>>
>>>> 3.a) update existing cells matched by name from table
>>>>
>>>> 4) parser->cells_clean(ctx, table)
>>>> /* to free cell's_info allocated by the parser driver */
>>>>
>>>> as alternative way, I think it would be more generic to
>>>> provide nvmem-provider.h API to update the existing cell info,
>>>> however it makes sense only when cells were parsed
>>>> by the cell parser, in the other situations the
>>>> cell should be well defined.
>>>>
>>>> with this approach the parser driver will be just called
>>>> via parser->cells_parse(ctx) and will call nvmem_cell_info_update()
>>>> for each parsed cells.
>>>
>>> TBH, This is an over kill.
>>>
>>> In nvmem provider driver probe you can parse the tlv data and update the
>>> dt nodes before nvmem register.
>>>
>>> rest of the code should just work as it is.
>>>
>>> --srini
>>
>> You mean to parse TLV in the particular nvmem provider driver (for
>> example in at24 driver) ? If so, then it will not allow to parse
>> this TLV format from the other kinds of nvmem.
>
> Why not?
>
Well, I think that nvmem driver and TLV parsing should somehow be
de-coupled from each other like block devices and FS does. BUT,
in case this TLV data will be used only on at24 devices then
may be it is OK.
> Can you also tell us which other nvmem providers are you going to test
> this on?
>
Currently I can test only on at24 devices. From the:
https://opencomputeproject.github.io/onie/design-spec/hw_requirements.html
"
Each ONIE system must include non-volatile storage which contains vital
product data assigned by the manufacturer. The non-volatile storage
could take the form of an EEPROM, a NOR-flash sector, a NAND-flash
sector or any other non-volatile storage medium.
"
I am not aware about other nvmem devices which are used for existing
ONIE supported boards.
> As long as you represent this parsing function as some library function,
> I do not see any issue.
> If any exported symbol is available for this then any nvmem provider
> could use it.
>
> --srini
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists