[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210920140938.GA24424@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:09:38 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jack Winch <sunt.un.morcov@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] configfs: use BIT() for internal flags
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 04:05:03PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> For better readability and maintenance: use the BIT() macro for flag
> definitions.
NAK. BIT() is the stupidest macro in the kernel and shall not be used
ever. And I'm pretty sure we had this discussion a few times.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists