[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUgSd6Sl/bFaGydO@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:47:51 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/mce: Get rid of msr_ops
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:53:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> + switch (reg) {
> + case MCA_CTL:
> + return mce_flags.smca ? MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_CTL(bank)
> + : MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL(bank);
>
> -static inline u32 smca_ctl_reg(int bank)
> -{
> - return MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_CTL(bank);
> -}
> + case MCA_STATUS:
> + return mce_flags.smca ? MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_STATUS(bank)
> + : MSR_IA32_MCx_STATUS(bank);
>
> -static inline u32 smca_status_reg(int bank)
> -{
> - return MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_STATUS(bank);
> -}
> + case MCA_ADDR:
> + return mce_flags.smca ? MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_ADDR(bank)
> + : MSR_IA32_MCx_ADDR(bank);
>
> -static inline u32 smca_addr_reg(int bank)
> -{
> - return MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_ADDR(bank);
> -}
> + case MCA_MISC:
> + return mce_flags.smca ? MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISC(bank)
> + : MSR_IA32_MCx_MISC(bank);
> + default: break;
> + }
I think this would be easier on the eyeballs with
a couple of helper functions:
if (mce_flags.smca)
return smca_msr_number(bank, reg);
else
return msr_number(bank, reg);
with the switch (reg) in each of those helper functions.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists