[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc987232-8687-a3cc-cc44-9e82e94ddd52@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:52:38 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@...wiler.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Pascal Zimmermann <pzimmermann@...electronics.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: build imx sdma driver as
module
On 9/20/21 4:49 PM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
>
> Build CONFIG_IMX_SDMA as a module to avoid the following boot issue:
>
> [ 5.214751] imx-sdma 20ec000.sdma: Direct firmware load for
> imx/sdma/sdma-imx6q.bin failed with error -2
> [ 5.215762] imx-sdma 20ec000.sdma: Falling back to sysfs fallback
> for: imx/sdma/sdma-imx6q.bin
Isn't there some ROM-side SDMA firmware baked into the MX6 which is used
as a fallback if loading newer one from filesystem fails ? I suspect the
default ROM firmware might be buggy.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists