[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d0b85ed3d70ce75033a7f546ad6a3c0bec32271.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:46:55 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, yang.zhong@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: sgx_vepc: extract sgx_vepc_remove_page
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 22:44 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Even to a Linux guest, since EPC should stil be represented in the state that
> matches the hardware. It'd be essentially a corrupted state, even if there was
> measures to resist this. Windows guests failing is essentially a side-effect
> of an issue, not an issue in the Windows guests.
Ugh, typos, sorry. Even to a Linux guest it would be illegit what I was meaning
to say...
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists