linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.68-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <513b55c6-0f1f-4a84-65b7-fd05e99c0bcb@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:00:39 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.68-rc1 review

On 9/20/21 11:39 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 9/20/21 9:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.68 release.
>> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:38:49 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.68-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
> 
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> 

Sorry taking that back, the merge did not really happen so I was not
testing 5.10.68 but 5.10.67, see my other comment about one of the
patches causing a regression, thanks!
-- 
Florian