linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ksmbd server security fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAH2r5ms0P9r6N_Tqw02TtpmHXaiJejdQgL2Rur1GMP=tyr0CMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:16:16 -0500
From:   Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ksmbd server security fixes

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 5:46 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 7:22 AM Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > 3 ksmbd fixes: including an important security fix for path
> > processing, and a missing buffer overflow check, and a trivial fix for
> > incorrect header inclusion
> >
> > There are three additional patches (and also a patch to improve
> > symlink checks) for other buffer overflow cases that are being
> > reviewed and tested.
>
> Note that if you are working on a path basis, you should really take a
> look at our vfs lookup_flags, and LOOKUP_BENEATH in particular.

This was also something that Ralph brought up, and Namjae is looking
at now.

> The way to deal with '..' and symlinks is not to try to figure it out
> yourself. You'll get it wrong, partly because the races with rename
> are quite interesting. The VFS layer knows how to limit pathname
> lookup to the particular directory you started in these days.
>
> Of course, that is only true for the actual path lookup functions.
> Once you start doing things manually one component at a time yourself,
> you're on your own.

Agreed.  Also FYI I removed the "ksmbd: Use LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS"
changeset from for-next (I left the first two buffer validation changesets
in, since those have been reviewed), since Namjae is working on
an updated version following your suggestion (and others' review feedback).

-- 
Thanks,

Steve