linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] soc: samsung: change SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:23:55 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] soc: samsung: change SOC_SAMSUNG default config
 logic

On 20/09/2021 21:03, Will McVicker wrote:
> Switch the default logic to enable SOC_SAMSUNG and it's sub-configs to
> be enabled by default via "default y if ARCH_EXYNOS" versus being
> selected by the ARCH_EXYNOS config directly. This allows vendors to
> disable these configs if they wish and provides additional flexibility
> to modularize them in the presence of a generic kernel.

This is not true. Vendors cannot disable these options as they are not
visible. Although I understand that Arnd prefers this way and I do not
object it, but your explanation is incorrect.
> 
> There are no .config differences with this change. The configs
> SOC_SAMSUNG, EXYNOS_CHIPID, EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS, and EXYNOS_PMU still
> remain enabled by default.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 4 ----
>  drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig  | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> index 3a66ed43088d..6a006490c9b9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> @@ -91,14 +91,10 @@ config ARCH_BRCMSTB
>  
>  config ARCH_EXYNOS
>  	bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos SoC family"
> -	select EXYNOS_CHIPID

This will conflict with:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/CAGOxZ50i6URzUQ7o7V4m7MR=2TqSeD6qx5fQaQDs+5nEq4fa2A@mail.gmail.com/T/#t

Build on top of it, please.


Best regards,
Krzysztof