linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] ath10k: don't fail if IRAM write fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:29:34 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     "sparks71\@gmx.de" <sparks71@....de>
Cc:     ojab // <ojab@...b.ru>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ath10k: don't fail if IRAM write fails

"sparks71@....de" <sparks71@....de> writes:

> Have you seen the new patch?
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/ath10k@lists.infradead.org/msg13784.html
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=master-pending&id=973de582639a1e45276e4e3e2f3c2d82a04ad0a6
>
>
> could probably have been communicated better

Yeah, apparently there are two different fixes now. I'll review both of
them and try to choose which one to take.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches