lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa4b9a73-dd70-a3bd-c00f-b632712cbf79@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:14:28 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Jeya R <jeyr@...eaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        fastrpc.upstream@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size
 calculation

Thank Jeya for fixing, one last nit-pick, Subject line is still broken.
It should be just "[PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size 
calculation"

instead of
"[PATCH] [PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation"

in this particular case where you are re-sending same version of patch, 
you can use subject line like:

"[RESEND PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: fix improper packet size calculation"


On 21/09/2021 11:57, Jeya R wrote:
> The buffer list is sorted and this is not being considered while
> calculating packet size. This would lead to improper copy length
> calculation for non-dmaheap buffers which would eventually cause
> sending improper buffers to DSP.
> 
> Fixes: c68cfb718c8f ("misc: fastrpc: Add support for context Invoke method")
> Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@...eaurora.org>
> 

Once that is fixed you can add

Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>


--srini

> Changes in v2:
> - updated commit message to proper format
> - added fixes tag to commit message
> - removed unnecessary variable initialization
> - removed length check during payload calculation
> ---
>   drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 10 ++++++----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index beda610..69d45c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -719,16 +719,18 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx)
>   static u64 fastrpc_get_payload_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, int metalen)
>   {
>   	u64 size = 0;
> -	int i;
> +	int oix;
>   
>   	size = ALIGN(metalen, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
> -	for (i = 0; i < ctx->nscalars; i++) {
> +	for (oix = 0; oix < ctx->nbufs; oix++) {
> +		int i = ctx->olaps[oix].raix;
> +
>   		if (ctx->args[i].fd == 0 || ctx->args[i].fd == -1) {
>   
> -			if (ctx->olaps[i].offset == 0)
> +			if (ctx->olaps[oix].offset == 0)
>   				size = ALIGN(size, FASTRPC_ALIGN);
>   
> -			size += (ctx->olaps[i].mend - ctx->olaps[i].mstart);
> +			size += (ctx->olaps[oix].mend - ctx->olaps[oix].mstart);
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ