[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUnbK840c9L6vpAl@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:16:27 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Kathiravan T <kathirav@...eaurora.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the qcom tree
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 06:12:06AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 20 Sep 19:30 PDT 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 261e8a95d9aa ("arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: add usb3 DT description")
> >
> > from the qcom tree and commit:
> >
> > 9da2c3f76164 ("arm64: qcom: ipq6018: add usb3 DT description")
> >
>
> Greg, this is not a USB patch, can you please drop it from your tree.
It was sent to me and says "add usb3 DT description", so how am I
supposed to know to reject it?
I'll go revert it from my tree. {sigh}
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists