linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] arm64: PCI: Introduce pcibios_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YUniZmeU3SA6+Aut@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:47:18 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc:     will@...nel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] arm64: PCI: Introduce pcibios_free_irq()
 helper function

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 02:04:06PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> pcibios_alloc_irq() will be called in pci_device_probe(), but there
> hasn't pcibios_free_irq() in arm64 architecture correspond it.
> pcibios_free_irq() is an empty weak function in drivers/pci/pci-driver.c.
> So add pcibios_free_irq() for correspond it. This will be called
> in pci_device_remove().
> 
> ====================
> v2: remove the change in pcibios_alloc_irq(), and modify the commit log.
> ====================
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index 2276689b5411..6ffd92126f65 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,13 @@ int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +void pcibios_free_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	if (!acpi_disabled)
> +		acpi_pci_irq_disable(dev);
> +}

For symmetry with the alloc path, this looks fine but I'd like Lorenzo
to confirm.

The other questions, what does it fix and do we need a cc stable?

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin