[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTFp6uj+bBhiEhvd2v346qOLx-t0bs=mv==8rCY5Zq+jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:43:04 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 9:17 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the selinux tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/io-wq.c
>
> between commit:
>
> dd47c104533d ("io-wq: provide IO_WQ_* constants for IORING_REGISTER_IOWQ_MAX_WORKERS arg items")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 5bd2182d58e9 ("audit,io_uring,io-wq: add some basic audit support to io_uring")
>
> from the selinux tree.
Thanks Stephen.
I noticed the same thing while doing some additional testing yesterday
and applied a very similar patch to my testing kernel. I'll be sure
to mention this to Linus when I send this up during the next merge
window.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists