[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABYd82a4OwxHNUUmUtBmTpSvWLu-f4sepHMF49kPQtWLU3MkDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:45:42 -0700
From: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] soc: samsung: change SOC_SAMSUNG default config logic
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 1:19 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > On 20/09/2021 21:03, Will McVicker wrote:
> > > Switch the default logic to enable SOC_SAMSUNG and it's sub-configs to
> > > be enabled by default via "default y if ARCH_EXYNOS" versus being
> > > selected by the ARCH_EXYNOS config directly. This allows vendors to
> > > disable these configs if they wish and provides additional flexibility
> > > to modularize them in the presence of a generic kernel.
> >
> > This is not true. Vendors cannot disable these options as they are not
> > visible.
>
> Good point, well made.
>
> > Although I understand that Arnd prefers this way and I do not
> > object it, but your explanation is incorrect.
Thanks Krzysztof for the reviews! I'm sorry I missed the whole "hidden
configs" part. I'll upload the series to include the fix that refactos
the Samsung SoC drivers menuconfig which will address that and allow
one to enable/disable those configs. I'm going to hold off though
until we hash out the rest of the discussion in the cover letter
email.
Thanks,
Will
>
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists