[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af562685-673a-489d-6a00-5e77329dc2a4@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:47:28 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, tcs.kernel@...il.com
Cc: vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jarkko@...nel.org, Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Handle SRCU initialization failure during
page track init
On 03/09/21 18:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Before moving forward with a fix, I'd like to get Paolo's input on dropping
> track_srcu in favor of kvm->srcu and avoiding this altogheter. Note, Paolo is on
> vacation at the moment, so this won't get attention for a week or more.
The reason for track_srcu's existence is to avoid complications in
kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot, which is called from the _write_ side of
kvm->srcu but is on the _read_ side of track_srcu.
I think this should be fixed easily by taking slots_lock in
kvm_page_track_register_notifier and kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier,
however it's a bit more complicated from the point of view of the lock
hierarchy and possible deadlocks.
So I'm open to patches that drop track_srcu, but for now I applied this
patch.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists