linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] hwrng: virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:02:06 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        rusty@...tcorp.com.au, amit@...nel.org, akong@...hat.com,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] hwrng: virtio - add an internal buffer

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 07:09:00PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> hwrng core uses two buffers that can be mixed in the
> virtio-rng queue.
> 
> If the buffer is provided with wait=0 it is enqueued in the
> virtio-rng queue but unused by the caller.
> On the next call, core provides another buffer but the
> first one is filled instead and the new one queued.
> And the caller reads the data from the new one that is not
> updated, and the data in the first one are lost.
> 
> To avoid this mix, virtio-rng needs to use its own unique
> internal buffer at a cost of a data copy to the caller buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> index a90001e02bf7..208c547dcac1 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> @@ -18,13 +18,20 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(rng_index_ida);
>  struct virtrng_info {
>  	struct hwrng hwrng;
>  	struct virtqueue *vq;
> -	struct completion have_data;
>  	char name[25];
> -	unsigned int data_avail;
>  	int index;
>  	bool busy;
>  	bool hwrng_register_done;
>  	bool hwrng_removed;
> +	/* data transfer */
> +	struct completion have_data;
> +	unsigned int data_avail;
> +	/* minimal size returned by rng_buffer_size() */
> +#if SMP_CACHE_BYTES < 32
> +	u8 data[32];
> +#else
> +	u8 data[SMP_CACHE_BYTES];
> +#endif

Let's move this logic to a macro in hw_random.h ?

>  };
>  
>  static void random_recv_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> @@ -39,14 +46,14 @@ static void random_recv_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
>  }
>  
>  /* The host will fill any buffer we give it with sweet, sweet randomness. */
> -static void register_buffer(struct virtrng_info *vi, u8 *buf, size_t size)
> +static void register_buffer(struct virtrng_info *vi)
>  {
>  	struct scatterlist sg;
>  
> -	sg_init_one(&sg, buf, size);
> +	sg_init_one(&sg, vi->data, sizeof(vi->data));

Note that add_early_randomness requests less:
        size_t size = min_t(size_t, 16, rng_buffer_size());

maybe track how much was requested and grow up to sizeof(data)?

>  
>  	/* There should always be room for one buffer. */
> -	virtqueue_add_inbuf(vi->vq, &sg, 1, buf, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	virtqueue_add_inbuf(vi->vq, &sg, 1, vi->data, GFP_KERNEL);


BTW no longer true if DMA API is in use ... not easy to fix,
I think some changes to virtio API to allow pre-mapping
s/g for DMA might be needed ...

>  
>  	virtqueue_kick(vi->vq);
>  }
> @@ -55,6 +62,8 @@ static int virtio_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t size, bool wait)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct virtrng_info *vi = (struct virtrng_info *)rng->priv;
> +	unsigned int chunk;
> +	size_t read;
>  
>  	if (vi->hwrng_removed)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -62,19 +71,33 @@ static int virtio_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t size, bool wait)
>  	if (!vi->busy) {
>  		vi->busy = true;
>  		reinit_completion(&vi->have_data);
> -		register_buffer(vi, buf, size);
> +		register_buffer(vi);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!wait)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	ret = wait_for_completion_killable(&vi->have_data);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +	read = 0;
> +	while (size != 0) {
> +		ret = wait_for_completion_killable(&vi->have_data);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		chunk = min_t(unsigned int, size, vi->data_avail);
> +		memcpy(buf + read, vi->data, chunk);
> +		read += chunk;
> +		size -= chunk;
> +		vi->data_avail = 0;
> +
> +		if (size != 0) {
> +			reinit_completion(&vi->have_data);
> +			register_buffer(vi);
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	vi->busy = false;
>  
> -	return vi->data_avail;
> +	return read;
>  }
>  
>  static void virtio_cleanup(struct hwrng *rng)
> -- 
> 2.31.1