[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czp0b8xq.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:24:17 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: "Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
"Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
"Stan Skowronek" <stan@...ellium.com>,
"Mark Kettenis" <kettenis@...nbsd.org>,
"Hector Martin" <marcan@...can.st>,
"Robin Murphy" <Robin.Murphy@....com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] PCI: apple: Add initial hardware bring-up
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:08:33 +0100,
"Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, at 22:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > From: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>
> >
> [...]
> > +
> > + /* Use the first reg entry to work out the port index */
> > + port->idx = idx >> 11;
> > + port->pcie = pcie;
> > + port->np = np;
> > +
> > + port->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(platform, port->idx + 2);
> > + if (IS_ERR(port->base))
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + rmw_set(PORT_APPCLK_EN, port + PORT_APPCLK);
>
> I think this should be
>
> rmw_set(PORT_APPCLK_EN, port->base + PORT_APPCLK);
Ouch. Well caught. I wonder how many of these I introduced...:-/
>
> > +
> > + rmw_set(PORT_PERST_OFF, port->base + PORT_PERST);
> > + gpiod_set_value(reset, 1);
> > +
> > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(port->base + PORT_STATUS, stat,
> > + stat & PORT_STATUS_READY, 100, 250000);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(pcie->dev, "port %pOF ready wait timeout\n", np);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Flush writes and enable the link */
> > + dma_wmb();
>
> I don't think this barrier is required.
It really isn't, and I though I had removed it. I now wonder whether I
have pushed out the right branch, or messed up by moving from one
machine to another...
> > +
> > + writel_relaxed(PORT_LTSSMCTL_START, port->base + PORT_LTSSMCTL);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> [...]
>
>
> Looks good to me otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-by: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
Thanks. Hopefully I'll manage to post a non broken series next time...
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists