linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/260] 5.4.148-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsb6P0w5xAjzGK_VxbC=yYCeOxre8SeCx1v4ggmPmOqcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:01:01 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/260] 5.4.148-rc1 review

On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 10:26, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On 9/20/21 11:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.148 release.
> > There are 260 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:38:49 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.148-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro's test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

>
> ## Build
> * kernel: 5.4.148-rc1
> * git: ['https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc']
> * git branch: linux-5.4.y
> * git commit: 9f540728b6a345a2a70420f891d351c4397d3849
> * git describe: v5.4.147-261-g9f540728b6a3
> * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.147-261-g9f540728b6a3
>
> ## No regressions (compared to v5.4.147)
>
> ## No fixes (compared to v5.4.147)
>
> ## Test result summary
> total: 81694, pass: 67304, fail: 635, skip: 12557, xfail: 1198
>
> ## Build Summary
> * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
> * arm: 288 total, 288 passed, 0 failed
> * arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
> * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed
> * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * mips: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed
> * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
> * riscv: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
> * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
> * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
> * x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed
>
> ## Test suites summary
> * fwts
> * igt-gpu-tools
> * install-android-platform-tools-r2600
> * kselftest-android
> * kselftest-arm64
> * kselftest-bpf
> * kselftest-breakpoints
> * kselftest-capabilities
> * kselftest-cgroup
> * kselftest-clone3
> * kselftest-core
> * kselftest-cpu-hotplug
> * kselftest-cpufreq
> * kselftest-drivers
> * kselftest-efivarfs
> * kselftest-filesystems
> * kselftest-firmware
> * kselftest-fpu
> * kselftest-futex
> * kselftest-gpio
> * kselftest-intel_pstate
> * kselftest-ipc
> * kselftest-ir
> * kselftest-kcmp
> * kselftest-kexec
> * kselftest-kvm
> * kselftest-lib
> * kselftest-livepatch
> * kselftest-membarrier
> * kselftest-memfd
> * kselftest-memory-hotplug
> * kselftest-mincore
> * kselftest-mount
> * kselftest-mqueue
> * kselftest-net
> * kselftest-netfilter
> * kselftest-nsfs
> * kselftest-openat2
> * kselftest-pid_namespace
> * kselftest-pidfd
> * kselftest-proc
> * kselftest-pstore
> * kselftest-ptrace
> * kselftest-rseq
> * kselftest-rtc
> * kselftest-seccomp
> * kselftest-sigaltstack
> * kselftest-size
> * kselftest-splice
> * kselftest-static_keys
> * kselftest-sync
> * kselftest-sysctl
> * kselftest-tc-testing
> * kselftest-timens
> * kselftest-timers
> * kselftest-tmpfs
> * kselftest-tpm2
> * kselftest-user
> * kselftest-vm
> * kselftest-x86
> * kselftest-zram
> * kvm-unit-tests
> * libgpiod
> * libhugetlbfs
> * linux-log-parser
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * ltp-commands-tests
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-controllers-tests
> * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
> * ltp-crypto-tests
> * ltp-cve-tests
> * ltp-dio-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-mm-tests
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-open-posix-tests
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * ltp-tracing-tests
> * network-basic-tests
> * packetdrill
> * perf
> * rcutorture
> * ssuite
> * v4l2-compliance
>
>
> Greetings!
>
> Daniel Díaz
> daniel.diaz@...aro.org
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org