lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:38:14 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <>
To:     Sean Christopherson <>,
        Peter Zijlstra <>,
        Ingo Molnar <>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <>,
        Will Deacon <>,
        Mark Rutland <>,
        Marc Zyngier <>, Guo Ren <>,
        Nick Hu <>,
        Greentime Hu <>,
        Vincent Chen <>,
        Paul Walmsley <>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <>,
        Albert Ou <>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <>,
        Juergen Gross <>
Cc:     Alexander Shishkin <>,
        Jiri Olsa <>,
        Namhyung Kim <>,
        James Morse <>,
        Alexandru Elisei <>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <>,
        Wanpeng Li <>,
        Jim Mattson <>,
        Joerg Roedel <>,
        Stefano Stabellini <>,,,,,,,,,
        Artem Kashkanov <>,
        Like Xu <>,
        Zhu Lingshan <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/16] KVM: x86: More precisely identify NMI from guest
 when handling PMI

On 22/09/21 02:05, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Note, this also doesn't completely prevent false positives if perf
> somehow ends up calling into KVM, e.g. an NMI can arrive in host after
> KVM sets its flag.

s/calling into KVM/being called from KVM/ ?

Not sure about what you meant though.  The code is nice, so

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists