[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210922005337.GC327412@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 21:53:37 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"lkml@...ux.net" <lkml@...ux.net>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"lushenming@...wei.com" <lushenming@...wei.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com" <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"david@...son.dropbear.id.au" <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 03/20] vfio: Add vfio_[un]register_device()
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:10:15PM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:01 AM
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 02:38:31PM +0800, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > > With /dev/vfio/devices introduced, now a vfio device driver has three
> > > options to expose its device to userspace:
> > >
> > > a) only legacy group interface, for devices which haven't been moved to
> > > iommufd (e.g. platform devices, sw mdev, etc.);
> > >
> > > b) both legacy group interface and new device-centric interface, for
> > > devices which supports iommufd but also wants to keep backward
> > > compatibility (e.g. pci devices in this RFC);
> > >
> > > c) only new device-centric interface, for new devices which don't carry
> > > backward compatibility burden (e.g. hw mdev/subdev with pasid);
> >
> > We shouldn't have 'b'? Where does it come from?
>
> a vfio-pci device can be opened via the existing group interface. if no b) it
> means legacy vfio userspace can never use vfio-pci device any more
> once the latter is moved to iommufd.
Sorry, I think I ment a, which I guess you will say is SW mdev devices
But even so, I think the way forward here is to still always expose
the device /dev/vfio/devices/X and some devices may not allow iommufd
usage initially.
Providing an ioctl to bind to a normal VFIO container or group might
allow a reasonable fallback in userspace..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists