[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210922010014.GE327412@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 22:00:14 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"lkml@...ux.net" <lkml@...ux.net>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"lushenming@...wei.com" <lushenming@...wei.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com" <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"david@...son.dropbear.id.au" <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 03/20] vfio: Add vfio_[un]register_device()
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:54:02AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:01 AM
> >
> > > One open about how to organize the device nodes under
> > /dev/vfio/devices/.
> > > This RFC adopts a simple policy by keeping a flat layout with mixed
> > devname
> > > from all kinds of devices. The prerequisite of this model is that devnames
> > > from different bus types are unique formats:
> >
> > This isn't reliable, the devname should just be vfio0, vfio1, etc
> >
> > The userspace can learn the correct major/minor by inspecting the
> > sysfs.
> >
> > This whole concept should disappear into the prior patch that adds the
> > struct device in the first place, and I think most of the code here
> > can be deleted once the struct device is used properly.
> >
>
> Can you help elaborate above flow? This is one area where we need
> more guidance.
>
> When Qemu accepts an option "-device vfio-pci,host=DDDD:BB:DD.F",
> how does Qemu identify which vifo0/1/... is associated with the specified
> DDDD:BB:DD.F?
When done properly in the kernel the file:
/sys/bus/pci/devices/DDDD:BB:DD.F/vfio/vfioX/dev
Will contain the major:minor of the VFIO device.
Userspace then opens the /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX and checks with fstat
that the major:minor matches.
in the above pattern "pci" and "DDDD:BB:DD.FF" are the arguments passed
to qemu.
You can look at this for some general over engineered code to handle
opening from a sysfs handle like above:
https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/blob/master/util/open_cdev.c
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists