[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210922085308.udvhfbzpn3vpbksr@gilmour>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 10:53:08 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xinliang Liu <xinliang.liu@...aro.org>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/24] drm/exynos: dsi: Adjust probe order
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:35:05PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13.09.2021 12:30, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> > W dniu 10.09.2021 o 12:12, Maxime Ripard pisze:
> >> Without proper care and an agreement between how DSI hosts and devices
> >> drivers register their MIPI-DSI entities and potential components, we can
> >> end up in a situation where the drivers can never probe.
> >>
> >> Most drivers were taking evasive maneuvers to try to workaround this,
> >> but not all of them were following the same conventions, resulting in
> >> various incompatibilities between DSI hosts and devices.
> >>
> >> Now that we have a sequence agreed upon and documented, let's convert
> >> exynos to it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> > This patch should be dropped, as it will probably break the driver.
> >
> > Exynos is already compatible with the pattern
> > register-bus-then-get-sink, but it adds/removes panel/bridge
> > dynamically, so it creates drm_device without waiting for downstream sink.
>
> Right, this patch breaks Exynos DSI driver operation. Without it, the
> whole series works fine on all Exynos based test boards.
Thanks for testing. Did you have any board using one of those bridges in
your test sample?
Thanks!
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists