linux-kernel - Re: beaglebone black boot failure Linux v5.15.rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c80c7af-daf5-c521-fe59-1f0c222a23e1@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:27:09 +0000
From:   "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Paul Barker <paul.barker@...cloud.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
        "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: beaglebone black boot failure Linux v5.15.rc1

On 9/21/21 19:40, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Matti, Tony,
> 
>> Am 21.09.2021 um 18:07 schrieb Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>:
>>
>> Hi Matti, Tony,
>>
>> On 9/21/21 2:47 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> [210920 08:23]:
>>>> Finally, adding the udelay(100); (as Tony suggested) at the end of the
>>>> omap_reset_deassert() did make the oops go away even when pruss_tm was
>>>> enabled. I don't know what would be a proper fix though.
>>
>> I have been able to boot v5.15-rc1 just fine on my BBB without any additional
>> changes [1].
> 
> Same for me with a v5.15-rc1 based kernel.
> 
>> May I ask what is your BBB board version? My board is rev.A5C.
> 
> I have an Rev B6 with EXP41 display attached. I think Matti reported a Rev C board?

Oops. Yes I did. I _thought_ I have Rev-C (3?) boards. Not exactly sure 
why I think so - perhaps that was what I ordered... And I really think 
the ones connected to automated test setup at the office are Rev-C.

Now that I tried to verify this - The one which I used to reproduce this 
issue (and now verify the patch from Tony) at home, seems to have say 
"PCB Rev6B" on PCB. However the u-boot says:

=>  printenv board_rev
board_rev=00C0
=>

but I have no idea where the environment variable comes from...

Maybe a stupid question - how to find out the exact revision?

Best Regards
	Matti Vaittinen