[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fc0a5e2-18c0-fa81-3eed-a6d596361633@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:49:24 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org,
Jan Lübbe <jlu@...gutronix.de>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: add cell-type to nvmem cells
On 22/09/2021 13:31, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08.09.21 12:02, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>>>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>>>
>>>> Some of the nvmem providers encode data for certain type of nvmem cell,
>>>> example mac-address is stored in ascii or with delimiter or in reverse order.
>>>>
>>>> This is much specific to vendor, so having a cell-type would allow nvmem
>>>> provider drivers to post-process this before using it.
>>> I don't agree with this assessment. Users of the OCOTP so far
>>> used this specific encoding. Bootloaders decode the OCOTP this way, but this
>>> encoding isn't really an inherent attribute of the OCOTP. A new NXP SoC
>>> with a different OTP IP will likely use the same format. Users may even
>>> use the same format on an EEPROM to populate a second off-SoC interface, .. etc.
>>>
>> That is okay.
> How would you go about using this same format on an EEPROM?
Am guessing that by the time there are more users for such formats,
those post-processing functions should be converted into some library
functions.
--srini
>
>>> I'd thus prefer to not make this specific to the OCOTP as all:
>>>
>>> * #define NVMEM_CELL_ENCODING_MAC_ADDRESS_IMX /* ... */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists