[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210922133217.GR327412@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 10:32:17 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Cc: "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"lkml@...ux.net" <lkml@...ux.net>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"lushenming@...wei.com" <lushenming@...wei.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com" <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"david@...son.dropbear.id.au" <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/20] iommu/iommufd: Add IOMMU_IOASID_ALLOC/FREE
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:51:38PM +0000, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 1:45 AM
> >
> [...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd.c
> > > index 641f199f2d41..4839f128b24a 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd.c
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > > struct iommufd_ctx {
> > > refcount_t refs;
> > > struct mutex lock;
> > > + struct xarray ioasid_xa; /* xarray of ioasids */
> > > struct xarray device_xa; /* xarray of bound devices */
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -42,6 +43,16 @@ struct iommufd_device {
> > > u64 dev_cookie;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +/* Represent an I/O address space */
> > > +struct iommufd_ioas {
> > > + int ioasid;
> >
> > xarray id's should consistently be u32s everywhere.
>
> sure. just one more check, this id is supposed to be returned to
> userspace as the return value of ioctl(IOASID_ALLOC). That's why
> I chose to use "int" as its prototype to make it aligned with the
> return type of ioctl(). Based on this, do you think it's still better
> to use "u32" here?
I suggest not using the return code from ioctl to exchange data.. The
rest of the uAPI uses an in/out struct, everything should do
that consistently.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists