lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <163231880052.25758.17370626929263049968.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:53:20 -0000
From:   "irqchip-bot for Marc Zyngier" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [irqchip: irq/irqchip-fixes] irqchip/gic: Work around broken Renesas
 integration

The following commit has been merged into the irq/irqchip-fixes branch of irqchip:

Commit-ID:     b78f26926b17cc289e4f16b63363abe0aa2e8efc
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms/b78f26926b17cc289e4f16b63363abe0aa2e8efc
Author:        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:29:25 +01:00
Committer:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:44:25 +01:00

irqchip/gic: Work around broken Renesas integration

Geert reported that the GIC driver locks up on a Renesas system
since 005c34ae4b44f085 ("irqchip/gic: Atomically update affinity")
fixed the driver to use writeb_relaxed() instead of writel_relaxed().

As it turns out, the interconnect used on this system mandates
32bit wide accesses for all MMIO transactions, even if the GIC
architecture specifically mandates for some registers to be byte
accessible. Gahhh...

Work around the issue by crudly detecting the offending system,
and falling back to an inefficient RMW+lock implementation.

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAMuHMdV+Ev47K5NO8XHsanSq5YRMCHn2gWAQyV-q2LpJVy9HiQ@mail.gmail.com
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index d329ec3..5f22c9d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(cpu_map_lock);
 
 #endif
 
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(needs_rmw_access);
+
 /*
  * The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match
  * the logical CPU numbering.  Let's use a mapping as returned
@@ -774,6 +776,25 @@ static int gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static void rmw_writeb(u8 bval, void __iomem *addr)
+{
+	static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(rmw_lock);
+	unsigned long offset = (unsigned long)addr & 3UL;
+	unsigned long shift = offset * 8;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 val;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rmw_lock, flags);
+
+	addr -= offset;
+	val = readl_relaxed(addr);
+	val &= ~GENMASK(shift + 7, shift);
+	val |= bval << shift;
+	writel_relaxed(val, addr);
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rmw_lock, flags);
+}
+
 static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 			    bool force)
 {
@@ -788,7 +809,10 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 	if (cpu >= NR_GIC_CPU_IF || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	writeb_relaxed(gic_cpu_map[cpu], reg);
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&needs_rmw_access))
+		rmw_writeb(gic_cpu_map[cpu], reg);
+	else
+		writeb_relaxed(gic_cpu_map[cpu], reg);
 	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
 
 	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
@@ -1375,6 +1399,30 @@ static bool gic_check_eoimode(struct device_node *node, void __iomem **base)
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool gic_enable_rmw_access(void *data)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The EMEV2 class of machines has a broken interconnect, and
+	 * locks up on accesses that are less than 32bit. So far, only
+	 * the affinity setting requires it.
+	 */
+	if (of_machine_is_compatible("renesas,emev2")) {
+		static_branch_enable(&needs_rmw_access);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+static const struct gic_quirk gic_quirks[] = {
+	{
+		.desc		= "broken byte access",
+		.compatible	= "arm,pl390",
+		.init		= gic_enable_rmw_access,
+	},
+	{ },
+};
+
 static int gic_of_setup(struct gic_chip_data *gic, struct device_node *node)
 {
 	if (!gic || !node)
@@ -1391,6 +1439,8 @@ static int gic_of_setup(struct gic_chip_data *gic, struct device_node *node)
 	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "cpu-offset", &gic->percpu_offset))
 		gic->percpu_offset = 0;
 
+	gic_enable_of_quirks(node, gic_quirks, gic);
+
 	return 0;
 
 error:

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ