linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] gpio: msc313: Add gpio support for ssd20xd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Sep 2021 23:52:46 +0900
From:   Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] gpio: msc313: Add gpio support for ssd20xd

Hi Bartosz,

On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 21:50, Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@...libre.com> wrote:
> > > I only have a part of this series in my inbox and patchwork doesn't
> > > have it at all - can you resend it with me in Cc?

I just checked and the series is in patchwork  -
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-gpio/patch/20210717045627.1739959-2-daniel@0x0f.com/
Unless I got the wrong patchwork?

> At the same time - is it too much to ask of people to just use
> scripts/get_maintainer.pl?

Sorry about that. scripts/get_maintainer.pl can return tons of people,
I get cc'd on stuff I have no idea about because I touched a line
somewhere, so I generally try to work out who needs to see a series
from the places touched and the get_maintainer.pl output instead of
just spamming everyone. In this case I thought Linus was the subsystem
maintainer as he took the initial series for this driver and I took
the mail recipients list from that series and pasted it in.

I'll be more careful next time.

Thanks,

Daniel