[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7d96308a-e8c4-4193-b0c3-50b3918c7deb@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:56:16 +0200
From: "Sven Peter" <sven@...npeter.dev>
To: "Heikki Krogerus" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
"Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Hector Martin" <marcan@...can.st>,
"Mohamed Mediouni" <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
"Stan Skowronek" <stan@...ellium.com>,
"Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
"Alexander Graf" <graf@...zon.com>,
"Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 3/9] usb: typec: tipd: Allow irq controller selection
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021, at 15:21, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 02:09:28PM +0200, Sven Peter wrote:
>> TI TPS6598x chips come with two separate i2c buses which each have an
>> independent interrupt controller. When only a single controller is
>> connected both can just be used.
>> On Apple M1 machines the secondary bus is however connected to the system
>> management controller and we must not modify its configuration. Prepare
>> for that by allowing to chose which interrupt controller(s) are used.
>
> This is good, but...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
>> index 656020e7f533..c2c399722c37 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
>> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ static const char *const modes[] = {
>> #define INVALID_CMD(_cmd_) (_cmd_ == 0x444d4321)
>>
>> struct tps6598x_hw {
>> + bool use_int1;
>> + bool use_int2;
>> };
>
> Wouldn't it be better to read that information from a device
> property/properties?
>
> Driver data is OK, but device property would be better. We don't have
> separate compatible for this on every board that uses it and we have
> also ACPI platforms.
Good point. Taking into account your review for the later patches I
think I can drop this completely though: On the Apple hardware the
second controller is always connected to the SMC so far. If it's
required later on we can always add the additional property with
a default value then.
Best,
Sven
Powered by blists - more mailing lists