| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:10:59 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, krisman@...labora.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, libc-alpha@...rceware.org,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/22] futex: Rename: hb_waiter_{inc,dec,pending}()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
In order to prepare introducing these symbols into the global
namespace; rename them:
s/hb_waiters_/futex_&/g
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
---
kernel/futex/core.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
index a8ca5b5cbc99..a26045e17fac 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/core.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
@@ -115,8 +115,8 @@
* waiters--; (b) unlock(hash_bucket(futex));
*
* Where (A) orders the waiters increment and the futex value read through
- * atomic operations (see hb_waiters_inc) and where (B) orders the write
- * to futex and the waiters read (see hb_waiters_pending()).
+ * atomic operations (see futex_hb_waiters_inc) and where (B) orders the write
+ * to futex and the waiters read (see futex_hb_waiters_pending()).
*
* This yields the following case (where X:=waiters, Y:=futex):
*
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ late_initcall(fail_futex_debugfs);
/*
* Reflects a new waiter being added to the waitqueue.
*/
-static inline void hb_waiters_inc(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+static inline void futex_hb_waiters_inc(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
atomic_inc(&hb->waiters);
@@ -287,14 +287,14 @@ static inline void hb_waiters_inc(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
* Reflects a waiter being removed from the waitqueue by wakeup
* paths.
*/
-static inline void hb_waiters_dec(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+static inline void futex_hb_waiters_dec(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
atomic_dec(&hb->waiters);
#endif
}
-static inline int hb_waiters_pending(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+static inline int futex_hb_waiters_pending(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static void __futex_unqueue(struct futex_q *q)
hb = container_of(q->lock_ptr, struct futex_hash_bucket, lock);
plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
- hb_waiters_dec(hb);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb);
}
/*
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ int futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
hb = futex_hash(&key);
/* Make sure we really have tasks to wakeup */
- if (!hb_waiters_pending(hb))
+ if (!futex_hb_waiters_pending(hb))
return ret;
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
@@ -979,8 +979,8 @@ void requeue_futex(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1,
*/
if (likely(&hb1->chain != &hb2->chain)) {
plist_del(&q->list, &hb1->chain);
- hb_waiters_dec(hb1);
- hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb1);
+ futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
plist_add(&q->list, &hb2->chain);
q->lock_ptr = &hb2->lock;
}
@@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
hb2 = futex_hash(&key2);
retry_private:
- hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
double_lock_hb(hb1, hb2);
if (likely(cmpval != NULL)) {
@@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
if (unlikely(ret)) {
double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
- hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
ret = get_user(curval, uaddr1);
if (ret)
@@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
*/
case -EFAULT:
double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
- hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr2);
if (!ret)
goto retry;
@@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
* - EAGAIN: The user space value changed.
*/
double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
- hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
/*
* Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of
* exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise
@@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@ int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
out_unlock:
double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
- hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
return ret ? ret : task_count;
}
@@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_q_lock(struct futex_q *q)
* decrement the counter at futex_q_unlock() when some error has
* occurred and we don't end up adding the task to the list.
*/
- hb_waiters_inc(hb); /* implies smp_mb(); (A) */
+ futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb); /* implies smp_mb(); (A) */
q->lock_ptr = &hb->lock;
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ void futex_q_unlock(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
__releases(&hb->lock)
{
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
- hb_waiters_dec(hb);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb);
}
void __futex_queue(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
@@ -1932,7 +1932,7 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
* Unqueue the futex_q and determine which it was.
*/
plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
- hb_waiters_dec(hb);
+ futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb);
/* Handle spurious wakeups gracefully */
ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists