[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUy4CdcUWJzQfM4N@yaz-ubuntu>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:23:21 +0000
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: "Joshi, Mukul" <Mukul.Joshi@....com>
Cc: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Register MCE notifier for Aldebaran RAS
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:30:55AM -0400, Joshi, Mukul wrote:
...
> > > + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * If it is correctable error, return.
> > > + */
> > > + if (mce_is_correctable(m))
> > > + return NOTIFY_OK;
> >
> > Shouldn't this be "NOTIFY_DONE" if "don't care" about this error?
>
> The thinking is we want to stop calling further consumers since it's a correctable error in GPU UMC and we are not taking any action about the correctable errors.
Shouldn't the error still be reported to EDAC for decoding and counting? I
think users want this.
But it looks to me that either NOTIFY_OK or NOTIFY_DONE will allow this, so
it's not a big deal. Was this intended to be NOTIFY_STOP?
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists