[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7aa60518-1045-5773-5b24-9f386cac1b8e@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 22:02:51 +0200
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org,
Jan Lübbe <jlu@...gutronix.de>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: add cell-type to nvmem cells
Hello Srini,
On 22.09.21 15:23, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 22/09/2021 14:08, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> On 22.09.21 15:03, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>> User A and B should mention about this encoding information in there NVMEM provider bindings.
>>>
>>> Based on that specific post-processing should be selected.
>>
>> So instead of just compatible = "atmel,at24c16"; there will be
>>
>> compatible = "user-A,my-eeprom", "atmel,at24c16";
>>
>> and
>>
>> compatible = "user-B,my-eeprom", "atmel,at24c16";
>
> It will depend how you specify encoding information.
I would specify them in cell-type, which you disagree with, thus
I am asking:
Is using a stock EEPROM with a non-canonical format for e.g. a MAC
address something that you think should be supported with NVMEM?
> The issue with making this encoding information generic is that the combinations are endless and nvmem core bindings is definitely not the right place for this.
Add a separate file and include it from the core file?
> ex:
> If I remember correctly we have mac-address stored in various formats:
> from old thread I can see
>
> Type 1: Octets in ASCII without delimiters. (Swapped/non-Swapped)
>
> Type 2: Octets in ASCII with delimiters like (":", ",", ".", "-"... so on) (Swapped/non-Swapped)
>
> Type 3: Is the one which stores mac address in Type1/2 but this has to
> be incremented to be used on other instances of eth.
>
> Type 4: Octets as bytes/u8, swapped/non-swapped
>
> This list can be endless and its not just the cell-type property you have to deal with, new properties keep popping up.
Yes, an extendible interface will likely encourage people to extend it.
Cheers,
Ahmad
> --srini
>
>
>
>>
>> and they each need to patch the at24 driver to call one of the
>> common library functions?
>>
>>>
>>> --srini
>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --srini
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd thus prefer to not make this specific to the OCOTP as all:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * #define NVMEM_CELL_ENCODING_MAC_ADDRESS_IMX /* ... */
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists