linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] infiniband hfi1: fix misuse of %x in ipoib

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YUwin2cn8X5GGjyY@unreal>
Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:45:51 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@...u.edu.cn>,
        "Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband hfi1: fix misuse of %x in ipoib_tx.c

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:05:42AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/22/21 10:51 AM, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH] infiniband hfi1: fix misuse of %x in ipoib_tx.c
> > > 
> > > Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than cast to (unsigned long
> > > long) and printed with %llx.
> > > Change %llx to %p to print the pointer.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@...u.edu.cn>
> > 
> > The unsigned long long was originally used to insure the entire accurate pointer as emitted.
> > 
> > This is to ensure the pointers in prints and event traces match values in stacks and register dumps.
> > 
> > I think the %p will obfuscate the pointer so %px is correct for our use case.
> 
> How about applying Guo's patch and adding a configuration option to the
> kernel for disabling pointer hashing for %p and related format specifiers?

Isn't kptr_restrict sysctl is for that?

> Pointer hashing is useful on production systems but not on development
> systems.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
>