[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210923083147.GA2083@kadam>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 11:31:47 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
phil@...lpotter.co.uk, martin@...ser.cx, fmdefrancesco@...il.com,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] staging: r8188eu: remove dead code from
rtl8188e_rf6052.c
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:21:34AM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> On 9/23/21 09:29, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 09:46:56PM +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> > > In this driver DynamicTxHighPowerLvl is set to TxHighPwrLevel_Normal
> > > and never changed. In the file rtl8188e_rf6052.c there are some if
> > > statements that check DynamicTxHighPowerLvl for other values than
> > > TxHighPwrLevel_Normal. The code in the if blocks is never executed.
> > > Remove the dead code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_rf6052.c | 57 +++++--------------
> > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_rf6052.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_rf6052.c
> > > index edaa9a6dfdb1..946a1b97d96f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_rf6052.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_rf6052.c
> > > @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ rtl8188e_PHY_RF6052SetCckTxPower(
> > > u8 *pPowerlevel)
> > > {
> > > struct hal_data_8188e *pHalData = GET_HAL_DATA(Adapter);
> > > - struct dm_priv *pdmpriv = &pHalData->dmpriv;
> > > struct mlme_ext_priv *pmlmeext = &Adapter->mlmeextpriv;
> > > u32 TxAGC[2] = {0, 0}, tmpval = 0, pwrtrac_value;
> > > bool TurboScanOff = false;
> > > @@ -112,34 +111,19 @@ rtl8188e_PHY_RF6052SetCckTxPower(
> > > }
> > > }
> > > } else {
> > > - /* Driver dynamic Tx power shall not affect Tx power.
> > > - * It shall be determined by power training mechanism.
> > > -i * Currently, we cannot fully disable driver dynamic
> > ^
> >
> > You're a vimster. :)
> >
>
> Not really, actually this was part of the original code. ;)
Huh... Alright then. Someone else was a vimster. Good that you're
deleting their mistakes!
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists