lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c73f4216-862a-25c9-bff0-c038b521ce2d@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:31:30 +0100
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To:     Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
        Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
        Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add Coresight support for RB5 board

On 23/09/2021 10:16, Tao Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 05:31:34PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Hi Tao
>>
>> On 13/09/2021 07:40, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>> This series adds Coresight support for SM8250 Soc on RB5 board.
>>> It is composed of two elements.
>>> a) Add ETM PID for Kryo-5XX.
>>> b) Add coresight support to DTS for RB5.
>>>
>>> This series applies to coresight/next
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
>>>
>>
>> Please could you mention what has changed since the previous version
>> in the cover letter ?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Suzuki
>>
> The version 2 of the series add more comments "Cortex-A77" for ETM pid.
> Do I need to rewrite the cover letter and then resubmit it for review?

No need to resubmit the series for reveiwing the patch. Ultimately
patches are what matters. But it is a good practise to keep the
changelog in the cover letter for a revision of a series. That helps
the reviewers to understand what has changed and we all are able to
spend our time efficiently. So, please follow that if possible.

Thanks
Suzuki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ