[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4efeaf1e-26d4-a2f0-89ab-1a9d795f1f5a@epam.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 11:13:31 +0000
From:   Oleksandr Andrushchenko <Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@...m.com>
To:     Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
        Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@...il.com>
CC:     "boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        "jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
        "julien@....org" <julien@....org>,
        "sstabellini@...nel.org" <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] xen-pciback: prepare for the split for stub and PV
On 23.09.21 14:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.09.2021 11:53, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>> @@ -180,10 +180,34 @@ config SWIOTLB_XEN
>>   	select DMA_OPS
>>   	select SWIOTLB
>>   
>> +config XEN_PCI_STUB
>> +	bool
>> +
>> +config XEN_PCIDEV_STUB
>> +	tristate "Xen PCI-device stub driver"
>> +	depends on PCI && !X86 && XEN
>> +	depends on XEN_BACKEND
>> +	select XEN_PCI_STUB
>> +	default m
>> +	help
>> +	  The PCI device stub driver provides limited version of the PCI
>> +	  device backend driver without para-virtualized support for guests.
>> +	  If you select this to be a module, you will need to make sure no
>> +	  other driver has bound to the device(s) you want to make visible to
>> +	  other guests.
>> +
>> +	  The "hide" parameter (only applicable if backend driver is compiled
>> +	  into the kernel) allows you to bind the PCI devices to this module
>> +	  from the default device drivers. The argument is the list of PCI BDFs:
>> +	  xen-pciback.hide=(03:00.0)(04:00.0)
>> +
>> +	  If in doubt, say m.
>> +
>>   config XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND
>>   	tristate "Xen PCI-device backend driver"
>>   	depends on PCI && X86 && XEN
>>   	depends on XEN_BACKEND
>> +	select XEN_PCI_STUB
> Does kconfig not at least warn about this? The selected item has a
> "depends on !X88" conflicting with the "depends on X86" here.
Why?
XEN_PCIDEV_STUB depends on PCI && !X86 && XEN
XEN_PCI_STUB has nothing, just bool
XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND selects XEN_PCI_STUB
>
> Jan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
