[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUxiPqShZT4bk0uL@unreal>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:17:18 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 2/7] vfio: Add an API to check migration state
transition validity
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:33:10AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Leon Romanovsky [mailto:leon@...nel.org]
> > Sent: 22 September 2021 11:39
> > To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>; Alex Williamson
> > <alex.williamson@...hat.com>; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>; David
> > S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Kirti
> > Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>; kvm@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Saeed Mahameed
> > <saeedm@...dia.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH mlx5-next 2/7] vfio: Add an API to check migration state
> > transition validity
> >
> > From: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>
> >
> > Add an API in the core layer to check migration state transition validity
> > as part of a migration flow.
> >
> > The valid transitions follow the expected usage as described in
> > uapi/vfio.h and triggered by QEMU.
> >
> > This ensures that all migration implementations follow a consistent
> > migration state machine.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/vfio.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > index 3c034fe14ccb..c3ca33e513c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > @@ -1664,6 +1664,47 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode
> > *inode, struct file *filep)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * vfio_change_migration_state_allowed - Checks whether a migration state
> > + * transition is valid.
> > + * @new_state: The new state to move to.
> > + * @old_state: The old state.
> > + * Return: true if the transition is valid.
> > + */
> > +bool vfio_change_migration_state_allowed(u32 new_state, u32 old_state)
> > +{
> > + enum { MAX_STATE = VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING };
> > + static const u8 vfio_from_state_table[MAX_STATE + 1][MAX_STATE + 1] = {
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = {
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING] = 1,
> > + },
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = {
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = 1,
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING | VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING]
> > = 1,
>
> Do we need to allow _RESUMING state here or not? As per the "State transitions"
> section from uapi/linux/vfio.h,
It looks like we missed this state transition.
Thanks
>
> " * 4. To start the resuming phase, the device state should be transitioned from
> * the _RUNNING to the _RESUMING state."
>
> IIRC, I have seen that transition happening on the destination dev while testing the
> HiSilicon ACC dev migration.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
> > + },
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = {
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> > + },
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING | VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = {
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = 1,
> > + },
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING] = {
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> > + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
> > + },
> > + };
> > +
> > + if (new_state > MAX_STATE || old_state > MAX_STATE)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return vfio_from_state_table[old_state][new_state];
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_change_migration_state_allowed);
> > +
> > static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > index b53a9557884a..e65137a708f1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ extern struct vfio_device
> > *vfio_device_get_from_dev(struct device *dev);
> > extern void vfio_device_put(struct vfio_device *device);
> >
> > int vfio_assign_device_set(struct vfio_device *device, void *set_id);
> > +bool vfio_change_migration_state_allowed(u32 new_state, u32 old_state);
> >
> > /* events for the backend driver notify callback */
> > enum vfio_iommu_notify_type {
> > --
> > 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists