[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CH0PR01MB71536B15C0911AFDE910E559F2A39@CH0PR01MB7153.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:18:46 +0000
From: "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@...u.edu.cn>,
"Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] infiniband hfi1: fix misuse of %x in ipoib_tx.c
> > >
> >
> > It doesn't look like that works in irqs, softirqs.
>
> Are you certain about it?
>
> That sysctl is supposed to control the output of %p, nothing more.
>
Actually I think is controls %pK.
The code here is what I was referring to.
/*
* kptr_restrict==1 cannot be used in IRQ context
* because its test for CAP_SYSLOG would be meaningless.
*/
if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq() || in_nmi()) {
if (spec.field_width == -1)
spec.field_width = 2 * sizeof(ptr);
return error_string(buf, end, "pK-error", spec);
}
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists