linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 02/17] clk: at91: pmc: execute suspend/resume only for backup mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:20:31 +0300
From:   Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
To:     <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
CC:     <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/17] clk: at91: pmc: execute suspend/resume only for backup mode

Before going to backup mode architecture specific PM code sets the first
word in securam (file arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c, function at91_pm_begin()).
Thus take this into account when suspending/resuming clocks. This will
avoid executing unnecessary instructions when suspending to non backup
modes. Also this commit changed the postcore_initcall() with
subsys_initcall() to be able to execute of_find_compatible_node() since
this was not available at the moment of postcore_initcall(). This should
not alter the tcb_clksrc since the changes are related to clocks
suspend/resume procedure that will be executed at the user space request,
thus long ago after subsys_initcall().

Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
---
 drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
index b2806946a77a..58e9c088cb22 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
 #include <linux/clkdev.h>
 #include <linux/clk/at91_pmc.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
@@ -110,13 +112,35 @@ struct pmc_data *pmc_data_allocate(unsigned int ncore, unsigned int nsystem,
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
+
+/* Address in SECURAM that say if we suspend to backup mode. */
+static void __iomem *at91_pmc_backup_suspend;
+
 static int at91_pmc_suspend(void)
 {
+	unsigned int backup;
+
+	if (!at91_pmc_backup_suspend)
+		return 0;
+
+	backup = *(unsigned int *)at91_pmc_backup_suspend;
+	if (!backup)
+		return 0;
+
 	return clk_save_context();
 }
 
 static void at91_pmc_resume(void)
 {
+	unsigned int backup;
+
+	if (!at91_pmc_backup_suspend)
+		return;
+
+	backup = *(unsigned int *)at91_pmc_backup_suspend;
+	if (!backup)
+		return;
+
 	clk_restore_context();
 }
 
@@ -132,6 +156,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sama5d2_pmc_dt_ids[] = {
 
 static int __init pmc_register_ops(void)
 {
+	struct platform_device *pdev;
 	struct device_node *np;
 
 	np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, sama5d2_pmc_dt_ids);
@@ -144,10 +169,30 @@ static int __init pmc_register_ops(void)
 	}
 	of_node_put(np);
 
+	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-securam");
+	if (!np)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
+		of_node_put(np);
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
+	of_node_put(np);
+	if (!pdev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	at91_pmc_backup_suspend = of_iomap(np, 0);
+	if (!at91_pmc_backup_suspend) {
+		pr_warn("%s(): unable to map securam\n", __func__);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
 	register_syscore_ops(&pmc_syscore_ops);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-/* This has to happen before arch_initcall because of the tcb_clksrc driver */
-postcore_initcall(pmc_register_ops);
+
+subsys_initcall(pmc_register_ops);
 #endif
-- 
2.25.1