[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210923132046.1860549-16-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:20:44 +0300
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
To: <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 15/17] clk: use clk_core_get_rate_recalc() in clk_rate_get()
In case clock flags contains CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE the clk_rate_get()
will return the cached rate. Thus, use clk_core_get_rate_recalc() which
takes proper action when clock flags contains CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 65508eb89ec9..64838754cdef 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -3108,7 +3108,7 @@ static int clk_rate_get(void *data, u64 *val)
{
struct clk_core *core = data;
- *val = core->rate;
+ *val = clk_core_get_rate_recalc(core);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists