lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:24:51 +0800 From: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@...il.com> To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com> Cc: clm@...com, dsterba@...e.com, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __clear_extent_bit Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com> 于2021年9月15日周三 下午1:33写道: > > > > On 2021/9/15 上午10:20, Hao Sun wrote: > > Hello, > > > > When using Healer to fuzz the latest Linux kernel, the following crash > > was triggered. > > > > HEAD commit: 6880fa6c5660 Linux 5.15-rc1 > > git tree: upstream > > console output: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-9wwV6-OmBcJvHGCbMbP5_uCVvrUdTp3/view?usp=sharing > > kernel config: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rUzyMbe5vcs6khA3tL9EHTLJvsUdWcgB/view?usp=sharing > > C reproducer: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eXePTqMQ5ZA0TWtgpTX50Ez4q9ZKm_HE/view?usp=sharing > > Syzlang reproducer: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/11s13louoKZ7Uz0mdywM2jmE9B1JEIt8U/view?usp=sharing > > > > If you fix this issue, please add the following tag to the commit: > > Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@...il.com> > > > > loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768 > > BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled > > BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents > > BTRFS info (device loop1): enabling ssd optimizations > > FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. > > name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0 > > CPU: 1 PID: 25852 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1 #16 > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS > > rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 > > Call Trace: > > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] > > dump_stack_lvl+0x8d/0xcf lib/dump_stack.c:106 > > fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:52 [inline] > > should_fail+0x13c/0x160 lib/fault-inject.c:146 > > should_failslab+0x5/0x10 mm/slab_common.c:1328 > > slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.99+0x4e/0xc0 mm/slab.h:494 > > slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3120 [inline] > > slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3214 [inline] > > kmem_cache_alloc+0x44/0x280 mm/slub.c:3219 > > alloc_extent_state+0x1e/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:340 > > This is the one of the core systems btrfs uses, and we really don't want > that to fail. > > Thus in fact it does some preallocation to prevent failure. > > But for error injection case, we can still hit BUG_ON() which is used to > catch ENOMEM. > Hello, Fuzzer triggered following crashes repeatedly when the `fault injection` was enabled. HEAD commit: 92477dd1faa6 Merge tag 's390-5.15-ebpf-jit-fixes' git tree: upstream kernel config: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KgvcM8i_3hQiOL3fUh3JFpYNQM4itvV4/view?usp=sharing [1] kernel BUG in btrfs_free_tree_block (fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3297): https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/ZtzVKWbcGm/ [2] kernel BUG in clear_state_bit (fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:658!): https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/hps2wXPG2b/ [3] kernel BUG in set_extent_bit (fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1021): https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/dcptjYYxgd/ [4] kernel BUG in set_state_bits (fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:939): https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NV9qtKB4KZ/ All the above crashes were triggered directly by the `BUG_ON()` macro in the corresponding location. Most `BUG_ON()` was hit due to `ENOMEM` when fault injected. Would it be better for btrfs to handle the `ENOMEM` error, e.g., gracefully return, rather than panic the kernel? Regards Hao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists