linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] livepatch,context_tracking: Avoid disturbing NOHZ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YUyBGJGCgrR56C7r@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:28:56 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     gor@...ux.ibm.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org,
        mbenes@...e.cz, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        joe.lawrence@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] livepatch,context_tracking: Avoid disturbing
 NOHZ_FULL tasks

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 03:14:48PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:

> IMHO, this is not safe:
> 
> CPU0				CPU1
> 
> klp_check_task(A)
>   if (context_tracking_state_cpu(task_cpu(task)) == CONTEXT_USER)
>      goto complete;
> 
>   clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_PATCH_PENDING);
> 
> 				# task switching to kernel space
> 				klp_update_patch_state(A)
> 				       if (test_and_clear_tsk_thread_flag(task,	TIF_PATCH_PENDING))
> 				       //false
> 
> 				# calling kernel code with old task->patch_state
> 
> 	task->patch_state = klp_target_state;
> 
> BANG: CPU0 sets task->patch_state when task A is already running
> 	kernel code on CPU1.

Why is that a problem? That is, who actually cares about
task->patch_state ? I was under the impression that state was purely for
klp itself, to track which task has observed the new state.