lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210923024944.GA446@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 19:49:44 -0700 From: Muhammad Falak Wani <mwani@...ux.microsoft.com> To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: Use sysconf to simplify libbpf_num_possible_cpus > > This approach is unfortunately broken, see also commit e00c7b216f34 ("bpf: fix > > multiple issues in selftest suite and samples") for more details: > > Oh, that predates me. Thanks, Daniel! Thank you Daniel for the context. > > Sorry, Muhammad, seems like current implementation is there for a > reason and will have to stay. Thanks a lot for working on this, > though. Hopefully you can help with other issues, though. > No worries at all, it was a good experience for me & I will try to help here and there for sure. Thank you again! -mfrw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists