lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:10:00 -0700 From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>, VMware Inc <pv-drivers@...are.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/12] x86/cpufeatures: Add TDX Guest CPU feature On 9/23/21 3:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:35:42AM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: >> @@ -495,6 +496,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init x86_64_start_kernel(char * real_mode_data) >> >> copy_bootdata(__va(real_mode_data)); >> >> + tdx_early_init(); >> + > > | Changes since v4: > | * Moved tdx_early_init() below copy_bootdata() because of > | cmdline and IDT dependencies. > > > What "cmdline and IDT dependencies"? > > Without a comment explaining why that thing must be there in the boot > order, you're adding more to the already fragile house of cards. > > Explain please. Initially, tdx_early_init() was added between kasan_early_init() and idt_setup_early_handler() in x86_64_start_kernel(). But I found that we have requirement to parse command line params in future changes to tdx_early_init() (not from the patches in this series). Since command line pointer is getting initialized in copy_bootdata(), I want move the tdx_early_init() call below it. Instead of moving the initialization order in future, I thought to move it appropriate place in the initial patch. Regarding IDT dependency, #VE handling will have a dependency on it (so it is better to initialize it before tdx_early_init()). > -- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists