[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210923143901.mdc6rejuh7hmr5vh@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:39:01 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc: naoya.horiguchi@....com, hughd@...gle.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, willy@...radead.org,
peterx@...hat.com, osalvador@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/5] mm: filemap: check if THP has hwpoisoned subpage
for PMD page fault
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 08:28:26PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> When handling shmem page fault the THP with corrupted subpage could be PMD
> mapped if certain conditions are satisfied. But kernel is supposed to
> send SIGBUS when trying to map hwpoisoned page.
>
> There are two paths which may do PMD map: fault around and regular fault.
>
> Before commit f9ce0be71d1f ("mm: Cleanup faultaround and finish_fault() codepaths")
> the thing was even worse in fault around path. The THP could be PMD mapped as
> long as the VMA fits regardless what subpage is accessed and corrupted. After
> this commit as long as head page is not corrupted the THP could be PMD mapped.
>
> In the regulat fault path the THP could be PMD mapped as long as the corrupted
s/regulat/regular/
> page is not accessed and the VMA fits.
>
> This loophole could be fixed by iterating every subpage to check if any
> of them is hwpoisoned or not, but it is somewhat costly in page fault path.
>
> So introduce a new page flag called HasHWPoisoned on the first tail page. It
> indicates the THP has hwpoisoned subpage(s). It is set if any subpage of THP
> is found hwpoisoned by memory failure and cleared when the THP is freed or
> split.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index dae481293b5d..740b7afe159a 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -3195,12 +3195,14 @@ static bool filemap_map_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page)
> }
>
> if (pmd_none(*vmf->pmd) && PageTransHuge(page)) {
> - vm_fault_t ret = do_set_pmd(vmf, page);
> - if (!ret) {
> - /* The page is mapped successfully, reference consumed. */
> - unlock_page(page);
> - return true;
> - }
> + vm_fault_t ret = do_set_pmd(vmf, page);
> + if (ret == VM_FAULT_FALLBACK)
> + goto out;
Hm.. What? I don't get it. Who will establish page table in the pmd then?
> + if (!ret) {
> + /* The page is mapped successfully, reference consumed. */
> + unlock_page(page);
> + return true;
> + }
> }
>
> if (pmd_none(*vmf->pmd)) {
> @@ -3220,6 +3222,7 @@ static bool filemap_map_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page)
> return true;
> }
>
> +out:
> return false;
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 5e9ef0fc261e..0574b1613714 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2426,6 +2426,8 @@ static void __split_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> /* lock lru list/PageCompound, ref frozen by page_ref_freeze */
> lruvec = lock_page_lruvec(head);
>
> + ClearPageHasHWPoisoned(head);
> +
Do we serialize the new flag with lock_page() or what? I mean what
prevents the flag being set again after this point, but before
ClearPageCompound()?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists