lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:45:07 +0200 From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 7:18 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > Back in 2012 or so I'd found a bunch of fun issues with multiple > pending signals on a lot of architectures. m68k looked scarier than > usual (due to the combination of variable-sized exception frames with the > way kernel stack pointer is handled by the hardware), but I'd convinced > myself that it had been correct. > > Unfortunately, I was wrong - handling of multiple pending signals > does *not* work correctly there. [...] Thank you, queuing in the m68k branch as fixes. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists