lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUyUhfTfY/3KtDTZ@yaz-ubuntu>
Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:51:49 +0000
From:   Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/mce: Get rid of the ->quirk_no_way_out()
 indirect call

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:53:55PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> 
> Use a flag setting to call the only quirk function for that.
>

I'd like to add another quirk function. First revision here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210504174712.27675-2-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com

Do you recommend this create another quirk flag and follow this patch? Or
should the quirks be grouped together somehow?

Thanks,
Yazen 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ