linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] xen/x86: adjust data placement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97182850-ebdc-aac2-5265-a3cac9244979@suse.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:04:46 +0200
From:   Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To:     Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc:     Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] xen/x86: adjust data placement

On 07.09.21 12:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Both xen_pvh and xen_start_flags get written just once aeryl during
> init. Using the respective annotation then allows the open-coded placing
> in .data to go away.
> 
> Additionally the former, like the latter, wants exporting, or else
> xen_pvh_domain() can't be used from modules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> ---
> I have to admit that it is completely unclear to me which form of
> exporting I should have used: xen_domain_type is GPL-only while
> xen_start_flags is not, yet both are used in similar ways, extending to
> xen_pvh.

I'd use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_pvh).


Juergen

Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3092 bytes)

Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)