[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0c0e659-23a8-59ab-edf8-5b380d723493@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 18:44:48 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] KVM: x86: SVM: add warning for CVE-2021-3656
On 14/09/21 17:48, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Just in case, add a warning ensuring that on guest entry,
> either both VMLOAD and VMSAVE intercept is enabled or
> vVMLOAD/VMSAVE is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 861ac9f74331..deeebd05f682 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -3784,6 +3784,12 @@ static __no_kcsan fastpath_t svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_apicv_activated(vcpu->kvm) != kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu));
>
> + /* Check that CVE-2021-3656 can't happen again */
> + if (!svm_is_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VMSAVE) ||
> + !svm_is_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VMSAVE))
> + WARN_ON(!(svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext &
> + VIRTUAL_VMLOAD_VMSAVE_ENABLE_MASK));
> +
> sync_lapic_to_cr8(vcpu);
>
> if (unlikely(svm->asid != svm->vmcb->control.asid)) {
>
While it's nice to be "proactive", this does adds some extra work.
Maybe it should be under CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL. It could be useful to
make it into its own function so we can add similar intercept invariants
in the same place.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists